A primer for those interested in Artificial Reefs as a way to dispose of old offshore structures, rigs and ships.
The quandary of what to do with a non-productive well and the associated rig structures has always plagued offshore operators. As federal and state regulations begin to tighten in terms of what has to be done, and when, oil and gas principals are taking a new look at alternatives to removal. Hence, when an operator is looking at options for decommissioning, reefing should be one of the first considerations. Helping to serve that need, the Texas Artificial Reef Program was created in 1990 and is managed by the Texas Parks and Wildlife Department (TPWD).
TPWD and its Domain
Led by three dedicated employees responsible for the entirety of the 367 miles of coastline along Texas, TPWD currently has 68 reef sites between the Mexico and Louisiana borders, ranging as far offshore as 90 miles. Of these sites, 60 are “rigs-to-reef” locations containing over 130 oil and gas structures. The remaining sites consist of nearshore and ship reefs.
The permitted reef sites are generally 40 acres and are large enough to contain multiple reefed jackets. The locations of the sites are determined by water depth, distance from other reef sites and navigational waterways, and the locations of donated platforms. In order for a new reef site to be developed, the jacket must be large enough to be the “anchoring structure” of a site to which additional material can be towed. One aspect of the Texas Artificial Reef Program is monitoring the reef sites. TPWD has a fairly extensive biological monitoring program, and enjoys interagency agreements with Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi, Texas A&M University- Galveston, and the University of Texas at Brownsville. This extends the TPWD monitoring capabilities beyond what a small in-house group can accomplish.
Tracking Rig Removals
One of the biggest challenges facing the Program is tracking rig removals and the TPWD gets significant pressure from recreational users to reef as many structures as possible. Although the TPWD does not expect to reef every structure, there are some that nevertheless get removed that would be ideal for reefing. Typically, this happens because the decommissioning group either doesn’t know about the reefing programs, or think their structure isn’t suitable for donation. Educating the oil and gas industry as to this option is therefore most important.
Through 2012, only about 10 percent of removed rigs have gone into Rigs-to-Reefs programs gulf wide. In an effort to capture more removed structures, the Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement (BSEE) has an Artificial Reef Coordinator, who reviews applications as they come in. If a structure looks like it would be a good candidate for reefing, he will put the operator in touch with an appropriate state reefing program. Unfortunately, the BSEE Artificial Reef Coordinator will only re-direct the operator after they have already filed a removal permit. Time and energy can be saved by approaching the reef programs as a first option.
In a Nutshell: The Rigs-to-Reef Process
A brief step-by-step guide to reefing an oil and gas structure is laid out below:
Starting the conversation: Reefing should be one of the first considerations for decommissioning, primarily because it often offers significant cost savings, and there are potentially more reefing options than might be evident at first glance. The first step is to contact the regional Artificial Reef Program to determine what options are available. Once the contact is made, the Reef Program will need basic information on the structure to determine reefing method; location, number of piles and width dimensions of the base and top.
Site selection: Size of the structure, proximity to the nearest established reef site, and water depth are the primary variables that determine reefing method and location. From a habitat standpoint, reef programs would prefer to reef in place, which usually offers the greatest cost saving to the operators as well. The downside to this method is the permitting process needed to create a new reef site takes significantly longer than towing a structure to a preexisting site. Towing the structure would be recommended if the current position is within a few miles of another site or if it is not large enough to be a suitable “anchor structure” for a new site. For instance, an 8-pile structure tied to an auxiliary 4-pile structure would be reefed in place, even if it was just a couple miles from another reef site, where as a single 4-pile rig would likely be towed to the nearest site.If a structure is to be towed, the distance of the tow and the size of the structure relative to the water depth at the proposed site must be considered. The U.S. Coast Guard generally requests 85 feet of clearance above reef material, but structures provide the best habitat when they are as close to the surface as possible. Hence, agencies such as the TWPD are left with a balancing act of placing structures where they meet the minimum clearance, but at the same time are not too deep.
Permitting the Reef Site: If it is determined that the structure would make a good candidate for reefing in place, the Artificial Reef Program will start the process of obtaining a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for a new 40- acre reef site. The only item the Reefing Program would need from the operator is a proposed reefing plat, which would include the coordinates of the center points of the reef site and structure, and pre- and post-reefing profile views with delineated depths. Although the permit application is not overly complex, it can take time. For the past year we have been required to get archaeology surveys completed for every new reef site application, which adds to both time and cost in order to reef in place. With this recent requirement, expect the site permitting process to take about a year. If the structure is being towed, no new site permit is required.
BSEE permits: The operator is responsible for submitting a decommissioning application to BSEE regardless of whether or not reefing is being considered. All decommissioning groups should be familiar with the steps required. If the operator is looking to reef the structure, the decommissioning plan would include the reefing options agreed to between the operator and the state. BSEE and BOEM subject matter experts will review all parts of the application as part of a NEPA analysis, and if necessary delineate required mitigations. Once the mitigations have been addressed, a final NEPA document is issued along with the permit for removal. If the structure is a good candidate for reefing, but the lease will expire prior to the expected reefing date, BSEE is able to make an extension of time for the lease.
Donation: The donation generally amounts to 50 percent of the realized savings, which is the difference in the cost of full removal and scrapping of the jacket and the cost of reefing the structure. These funds are used by the Texas Artificial Reef Program for siting, designing, constructing, monitoring, and otherwise managing the system of artificial reefs in Texas. The majority of the funding to support the Artificial Reef Program comes directly from Rigs-to-Reefs donations.
Material Donation Agreements: Once deployment method and location of the reefing has been determined, permits have been obtained, and a donation amount agreed upon, the Program will work up a Material Donation Agreement (MDA). The MDA states that the structure will go to a specific reef location previously agreed upon by both parties, and once the platform is reefed according to the agreement, the state takes on all liability for the jacket. However, this does not relinquish the operator from liability associated with wells. Once the MDA is signed by both parties, the operator may move forward with removal.
Removal and placement: The operator is responsible for all work and associated costs with reefing the structure. During the reefing process a representative of the Artificial Reef Program may be present as an observer.
Final Survey: Once the structure has been placed on the bottom, a certified survey plat must be provided to the reefing program. The surveys consist of an overall chart of the site including coordinates of the structure and relative locations of other structures within the reef site, a profile view of the structure with depths indicated, and a multi-beam sonar image of the structure in as-reefed position.
After Care: Once the structure is reefed as specified in the MDA and the donation has been received, the state reefing program assumes liability and is responsible for maintaining any required marker buoys, notifying the NOAA charting division of the reefing, and completing biological monitoring on the reef sites.
Reasons to Reef those Rigs
The Gulf coast is fortunate in that artificial reef programs are strongly supported by industry, recreational users and the scientific community. Conflicts of interest are addressed early in the process, and are usually related to placement of the structures. Although technology is moving past the age of fixed platforms, by working together, operators, reefing programs and the public all benefit from keeping many of the current structures in the water to maintain the habitat that has formed around these rigs.
(As published in the January 2014 edition of Marine News - www.marinelink.com)
Feds issue Interim Guidelines for reefing old rigs at the same time that NOAA identifies myriad potentially polluting shipwrecks. Salvage opportunities abound. In late June, the U.S. Interior Department revised its interim policy for defunct, offshore oil-and-gas platforms, making it easier to turn them
with somewhat unique life cycles. For the most part, they reproduce sexually, broadcasting gametes into the water. Often, an entire coral colony or reef will spawn on the same night. Coral may also reproduce asexually by producing genetically identical polyps. Fertilized gametes drift in the current
As extensive exploration of shallow and deepwater oil and gas plays along Brazil’s Equatorial Margin (EM) progresses, a large and unique reef system has been discovered among offshore exploration and production blocks. In a research article recently published in Science Advances, a group of researchers from
managed by the US Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) and The Nature Conservancy. Palmyra Atoll encompasses some of the last remaining near-pristine reef environments, boasting an intact marine predator-dominated marine ecosystem where species’ richness and diversity abound, with more than 176 species
Preserving pristine Coral Reefs in a remote location is no small task, but also of big importance. Global Diving & Salvage shows how it is done. On June 19, 1991 officials with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration were notified of a 121 foot long fishing vessel shipwrecked and hard
to Earth & Environmental sciences. Germany was ranked 3rd top country for its contributions to the journal. ARC Center of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University Topic: Tropical Marine Science No. of employees: ~3,000 Address: ARC Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies James
According to the Australian Reef Pilots (ARP), Australia is now the fourth biggest cruise market in the world. Part of the boom in cruising has to do with more specialty cruise ships coming to the region. The smaller size cruise ship segment seems purpose-designed to transit the remote waters of the Kimberley
SeaLaser100s, a rear facing black and white DeepSea Power and Light Multi-SeaCam, and a DOE single function manipulator/cutter. Mississippi Artificial Reef Program Coordinator, Kerwin Cuevas, and his crew Jimmy Sanders and Eric Broussard, participated in a week long training to familiarize themselves with
to nighttime and a white light atop the island could be seen flashing. Turning to the radar, the captain pointed out Bligh Island and the less distinct Reef Island next to it. Satisfying the curiosity of the group, the captain crossed the traffic lanes and edged the ship near the buoy with the flashing
about 30 miles north of Sitka, Alaska on Monday, May 10. Crowley, under contract with the Alaska Marine Highway System, floated the Le Conte off Cozian Reef. The salvage team made internal and external surveys and the Le Conte was towed to the Ketchikan Ship Yard by the tug Chahunta with Crowley's salvage
operating its law enforcement vessels in a dangerous manner causing serious risk of collision to Philippine vessels navigating in the vicinity; and that the reefs that China had claimed as low-tide elevations did not generate any entitlement to an exclusive economic zone or continental shelf. The Philippines
Images: Skangas pable vessels calling (or hoping to call) ports in Scandinavia and Northern Eu- An inchoate business/logistical model at certain ports? rope and some Asian ports. that seems to be emerging is that of a wa- LNG fueling makes sense where trade In the United States, Jacksonville, Fla.
The situation for the ship- ping companies based in Germany has been, much like the rest of the world in 2017, mostly tight. Cur- rently, the German shipping companies are undergo- ing changes against this background. They are con- centrating more and more on their core competences. Maritime Reporter
Group, which has been a world leader to the latest improvements in automo- Does Volvo Penta have any en- global R&D center 18 months deavors in the development of ago there was a push regarding in emissions technology. For instance, tive-scale energy storage technology. Volvo was an early pioneer in
Advertiser Index Page Company Website Phone# C2 Arconas www.arconas.com Please visit us online 5 Canaveral Port Authority www.portcanaveral.com Visit our website 3 Connecticut Port Authority www.CTPortAuthority.com (860) 577-5174 25 CPE Certifed Port Executive www.certifedportexecut
BIG DATA FOR THE GREATER GOOD: BIMCO’s Peter Lundahl Rasmussen weighs in on BIMCO’s high tech measurement tool for shipping Key Performance Indicators. n June of 2015, BIMCO took ownership of the unique cross-industry group of experts, led by InterManager – the in- Shipping KPI System from industry
STATISTICS BIMCO R N t 3 epORt aMes Op hen it comes to bulk shipping, there is arguably too Some Ports: “well below standard” much attention given to the ships themselves, the At the other end of the spectrum, a number of ships complained Wcost of freight in the daily Baltic Index, and perhaps of a
INSIGHTS All Images: courtesy DNV GL n late April, DNV GL Maritime CEO Knut Ørbeck- DELIVERING LEADERSHIP Nilssen delivered the annual review for the International “When many in the maritime community feel like their Association of Classifcation Societies (IACS) in Lon- businesses are in dire straits
ooking back at what has led us to our current truck- and truck drivers have moved on to different jobs. Already ing situation; it can be argued that “we saw this heading into decline, and now coupled with industry’s failure coming.” For more than a decade now, the US logis- to renew its talent pool
PEOPLE & COMPANY NEWS Ekse Ponstein Mulherin ChiarelloDavidsonWhittakerSchaller ing service as President of Maersk and Chris Brown, scienti? c program to Sea Cloud as a deck hand in 1996. Logistics USA. Chiarello was named manager. Dr. Nick Welschmeyer, lead This ? rst position on a sailing ship a
without incident. No equipment was lost, and the MG3 Red Sea and Arabian Gulf, it began to build an impressive vessel successfully avoided the submerged reefs identi? ed in archive of highly accurate Satellite Derived Bathymetry that the satellite data. The project was completed on schedule and could
DERIVING WATER DEPTH data, to perform a ‘desktop mapping’ of the numerous jagged TCarta commercialized the proprietary technique to extract coral reefs in the area. This work was done long before the water depth measurements from satellite imagery and now ship embarked on its voyage. In fact, MG3
MR April 2018 Ad Index_R:Layout 1 4/9/2018 11:54 AM Page 1 ADVERTISER INDEX Page#Advertiser Website Phone #Page#Advertiser Website Phone # C2ABS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .ww2.eagle.org/cybersecurity.com . . .Please visit us online 35International Registries, Inc. . . . . . . .
Per Martin Tanggaard, Director, Nor-Shipping oices As does, he believes, Nor-Shipping’s Oslo and Lillestrøm. As in 2017 it will potential and infrastructure to further leaders within Northern Europe, provid- on-going focus on sustainability. Sus- feature six themed halls, with Hall A boost the industry
PEOPLE & COMPANY NEWS SSI Global Diving and Salvage Larkins Pierson Thayer Massa Dudson SUNY CMA Morais DeVilbiss papers and continues to provide in- President of Casualty and Emergency tracts Manager. Lobree has more sights on innovative solutions for the Response, David DeVilbiss has been than 25
ment statewide. This equipment makes-up only 4% of port- California regulators have targeted the maritime indus- related diesel emissions and less than 1% of regional diesel try to lead the way on zero emissions because it can. State emissions. Or, we can place our bets on electri? ed versions regulators
Authors Contributors & Steve Candito is the CEO of Eco- two decades of maritime industry chlor, Inc. Prior to joining Ecochlor, experience, including more than Steve was Founder, President and 14 years in environmental and CEO of Foresea Consulting where planning positions at the Port of he provided
tion vessels that can sail the Polar Regions as well as the rest of the world. Accommodating only 184 passengers, all four ships will feature a reinforced hull for polar exploration, sta- bilizers, ? ve passenger decks, a ? eet of Zodiacs for excursions and transfers, an in? nity pool, an aft marina for
CRUISE SHIPPING ANALYSIS nlike the cargo side of shipping, the cruise business has seen a steadily upward trajectory, with steady growth over decades. The 2018 annual “State of the Charleston, SC is a port that has faced UCruise Industry” report from Cruise Lines Interna- tional Association (CLIA) was
MR March 2018 Ad Index:Layout 1 3/9/2018 1:53 PM Page 1 ADVERTISER INDEX Page#Advertiser Website Phone #Page#Advertiser Website Phone # 27Advanced Polymer Coatings . . . . . . . . .www.adv-polymer.com . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(440) 937-6218 C3Lubriplate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .www.
THE THEMATIC ZONE EXHIBITORS Sea Japan Seminars Theme Company Name International Maritime Seminar ? Ships and Marine Technology Seminar ? Kawasaki Kisen Kaisha, Ltd. ("K" LINE) Ship Owners Mitsui O.S.K Lines, Ltd. (MOL) 8FEOFTEBZ"QSJM 'SJEBZ"QSJM Nippon Yusen Kabushiki Kaisha (NYK Line) 4 ? ?? 5IF0QFOJOH"EESF
Japan Ship Machinery and Equipment Association Japan Ship Machinery and Equipment Association (JSMEA) joins Sea Japan as Japan Pavilion, supported by the Nippon Foundation and consists of Japanese Maritime Cluster and JSMEA members. Japan Pavilion introduces cutting-edge technology, products and service
Angus Frew, Secretary General, BIMCO oices can drive standardization in reporting across the world. beginning of being able to protect yourself against cy- sell ships for the capital gain, and one more ship from A huge amount of the bridge team’s time is spent re- ber attacks. BIMCO is a leading light in
Angus Frew, Secretary General, BIMCO oices Angus FrewAngus Frew Secretary General, BIMCO BIMCO’s Secretary General & CEO Angus Frew spent some time with Maritime Reporter & Engineering News to discuss the burning topics of the day in maritime … environmental regulation, digitalization & cyber security
chase, Factory Authorized Tests and installation moved along well and without problems. Trial issues effecting normal Class testing and construction occurred as a direct result of tier compliance. When taking an ATB tug out? t- ted with two GEV250 propulsion engines out on initial sea trials, we were