Page 39: of Maritime Reporter Magazine (February 2016)

Cruise Ship Technology Edition

Read this page in Pdf, Flash or Html5 edition of February 2016 Maritime Reporter Magazine

“Ten years ago, before the smart phones and the pads were available, laptops were dominant and Internet Cafe’s were a main feature on cruise ships and ferries. Standard bandwidth at that time was between 512kb and 1MB. Today, we can see that it has increased tremendously, from 10, 20, 30, and up to .” 100MB per ship

Tommy Konkol Dybvad

Director Cruise & Ferry Services, Marlink ruise ship design and out? t width demanded and available onboard. and managers buy bandwidth in bulk, ? eets,” said Tommy Konkol Dybvad, have evolved rapidly over the Bandwidth at sea has grown more slow- and leaving the decision on bandwidth Director Cruise & Ferry Services, Mar- past 20 years. While the phys- ly but parallel with bandwidth demand per ship to their discretion. The most in- link. “Instead of contracting bandwidth

Cical manifestations onboard a ashore, with demands from customers teresting part of the service is the man- per vessel, it is much more cost-ef? cient modern cruise ship are pretty easy to see and crew, as well as demands from in- agement aspect of the bandwidth, as an for the customer to agree on a bandwidth ... from the massive size of new ships, novative new monitoring and control owner can take bandwidth from other that is shared across the ? eet, delivering to unprecedented shopping and eating systems onboard as well as the business vessels and increase the bandwidth of cost-savings and ? exibility. We already experiences, to spectacular new enter- end of running the ship driving demand. a particular ship – even for a short time do this with several customers region- tainment amenities ... a more subtle yet Marlink has championed a package – to manage anticipated increases in us- ally, including Stena Line and Simon equally important transformation has which can loosely be described as a age. Møkster. They have a shared bandwidth been the exponential increase in band- ‘cloud of bandwidth,’ whereby owners “This service is for companies with across the ? eet, and bandwidth can be

UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT • SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

RoRo equipment

In re OIC RUN-OFF LIMITED and THE LONDON AND

In a Case Under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code

OVERSEAS INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED

Access equipment for

Case No. 15-13054 (SCC)

Debtors in Foreign Proceedings.

cruise & naval vessels x : : : : x

Deck machinery

NOTICE OF ORDER GRANTING RECOGNITION OF

FOREIGN MAIN PROCEEDINGS, PERMANENT INJUNCTION AND RELATED RELIEF

Marine cranes

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT, in connection with the petitions filed on November 16, 2015 (the “Petitions”) by

Hatch covers

Dan Yoram Schwarzmann and Paul Anthony Brereton Evans (the “Petitioners”), in their capacity as the duly authorized

Global service solutions foreign representatives, as defined in section 101(24) of title 11 of the United States Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”), of

OIC Run-Off Limited (subject to a scheme of arrangement) (“Orion”) and The London and Overseas Insurance www.ttsgroup.com

Company Limited (subject to a scheme of arrangement) (“L&O,” together with Orion, the “Companies”), the United

States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) has entered an Order Granting

Recognition of Foreign Main Proceedings, Permanent Injunction and Related Relief (the “Order) [Docket No. 18], which provides, among other things, that: 1. The proceedings respecting the Amending Scheme (as defined in the Order) in the High Court of Justice of England and Wales are granted recognition as foreign main proceedings pursuant to section 1517 of the Bankruptcy Code; 2. All relief afforded foreign main proceedings pursuant to section 1520 of the Bankruptcy Code is granted; 3. The Amending Scheme (including any modifications or amendments thereto) shall be given full force and effect in the United States, and shall be binding on and enforceable against any person or entity that is a Scheme Creditor (as defined in the Amending Scheme), including, without limitation, against such person or entity in its capacity as a debtor of the Company in the United States; 4. All Scheme Creditors are permanently enjoined from taking any action in contravention of, or inconsistent with, the Amending Scheme; 5DLVLQJHI?FLHQF\ 5. Except as otherwise provided in the Order or in the Amending Scheme, all Scheme Creditors are permanently enjoined from: (a) commencing or continuing any proceedings (including, without limitation, arbitration, mediation or any judicial, quasi-judicial, administrative action, proceeding or process whatsoever) against a Company or any of its property in the United States, or any proceeds thereof, or seeking discovery of any nature against a Company; (b) enforcing any judicial, quasi-judicial, administrative judgment, assessment or order, or arbitration award and commencing or continuing any proceedings (including, without limitation, arbitration, mediation or any judicial, quasi- judicial, administrative action, proceeding or process whatsoever) or any counterclaim to create, perfect or enforce any lien, attachment, garnishment, setoff or other claim against a Company or any of its property in the United States, or any proceeds thereof, including, without limitation, rights under reinsurance or retrocession contracts; and (c) invoking, enforcing or relying on the benefits of any statute, rule or requirement of federal, state, or local law or regulation requiring a Company to establish or post security in the form of a bond, letter of credit or otherwise as a condition of prosecuting or defending any proceedings (including, without limitation, arbitration, mediation or any judicial, quasi- judicial, administrative action, proceedings or process whatsoever) and such statute, rule or requirement will be rendered null and void for proceedings; and 6. In accordance with the terms of the Amending Scheme, all persons and entities in possession, custody or control of property of a Company or the proceeds thereof, are required to turn over and account for such property or proceeds thereof to such Company or the Scheme Administrators (as defined in the Amending Scheme).

Copies of the Petitions and the supporting documents and the Amending Scheme documents are available (1) on the Bankruptcy Court’s Electronic Case Filing System, which can be accessed from the Bankruptcy Court’s website at https://ecf.nysb.uscourts.gov/ (a PACER login and password are required to retrieve a document), (2) on the

Petitioners’ website, www.oicrun-offltd.com, or (3) upon written request to the undersigned counsel:

Attorneys for the Petitioners •

CHADBOURNE & PARKE LLP • 1301 Avenue of the Americas

New York, New York 10019 • (212) 408-5100 • Attn: Howard Seife, Esq. and Eric Daucher, Esq.

www.marinelink.com 39

MR #2 (34-41).indd 39 2/3/2016 10:57:17 AM

Maritime Reporter

First published in 1881 Maritime Reporter is the world's largest audited circulation publication serving the global maritime industry.