Page 21: of Maritime Reporter Magazine (February 2026)

a request is reasonable and when it crosses into unsafe terri- compliance without context can undermine safety. Training tory. They recognize early warning signs that paperwork alone should emphasize that regulations are not abstract require- cannot reveal. Training shore teams to think like the ship does ments. They are applied within real operational constraints.

not require everyone to sail, but it does require structured ex- Teach shore teams how compliance decisions affect crew posure to operational reality. workload, timing, and risk exposure. Encourage questions such as whether a request can be delayed, staged, or supported differently. Context-driven compliance is not about lowering

Training Shore Staff Using Vessel Scenarios

One of the most effective ways to bridge the gap is scenario- standards. It is about applying them intelligently.

based training built around real vessel operations. Instead of When shore staff understand the ship’s reality, compliance abstract policy discussions, shore teams should work through becomes a partnership rather than a source of friction.

realistic scenarios that mariners face.

Examples include responding to a failed inspection item while Building a Two-Way Training Culture offshore, balancing maintenance schedules against weather de- Training the shore to think like the ship does not dimin- lays, or managing crew rest when voyages run long. Present these ish the importance of shore expertise. Instead, it strength- scenarios as decision exercises. Ask shore staff what they would ens it. The goal is alignment, not hierarchy. Shore teams do, then walk through the operational consequences onboard. bring regulatory knowledge, resources, and strategic per-

This type of training builds empathy and practical judg- spective. Mariners bring operational judgment and situ- ment. It shifts conversations from what should happen on pa- ational awareness.

per to what can happen safely in practice. Effective organizations train both sides to appreciate the oth- er. That means creating regular touchpoints, shared training ex-

Learning from Incidents Caused by ercises, and open channels for feedback. Over time, this builds trust and improves decision quality across the organization.

Misaligned Assumptions

Many incidents and near misses trace back to misaligned

Closing the Gap assumptions between shore and ship. A compliance deadline that ignores voyage realities. A maintenance request that as- The most successful maritime organizations recognize sumes spare parts are immediately accessible. A crew change that safety and ef? ciency depend on how well shore and plan that overlooks immigration or weather constraints. ship understand each other. Roles like DPA and Port Cap-

Training programs should analyze these incidents openly and tain exist because that bridge matters. Training shore teams without blame. Focus on how assumptions formed and where to think like the ship extends that value across the entire context was missing. Use real examples, anonymized if neces- organization.

sary, to show how small disconnects escalate into operational When shore decisions are informed by operational reality, risk. This approach turns incidents into training assets and re- training becomes more relevant, compliance becomes safer, inforces the idea that safety depends on shared understanding. and crews feel supported rather than pressured. Bridging this gap is not a one-time effort. It is an ongoing training commit-

Making Compliance Decisions Safer Through Context ment that pays dividends every day at sea.

Compliance is a major driver of shore-based decisions, but Thank you for reading, and until next time, sail safely.

a subsidiary of BioMicrobics, Inc.

Proudly made

Longest Lasting,

Best Performing MSD’s in the U.S.A.

PERIOD!

www.SciencoFAST.com [email protected]

SciencoFast_MR2026_Yellow_QuarterPGAd.indd 1 2/5/2026 7:15:44 PM www.marinelink.com 21

MR #2 (18-33).indd 21 MR #2 (18-33).indd 21 2/5/2026 7:26:19 PM2/5/2026 7:26:19 PM