Page 46: of Maritime Logistics Professional Magazine (Q2 2011)

Energy Transportation

Read this page in Pdf, Flash or Html5 edition of Q2 2011 Maritime Logistics Professional Magazine

46 Maritime Professional 2Q 2011 trading departments while mitigating risk. IMOS compiles a unified view of the company’s physical and paper freight positions. Evangelos Efstathiou,

Director, Trading & Risk Management at Veson Nautical, explains, “In IMOS, every deal is a contract. You define the contract, duration, the counterparty, the face value of the deal you’ve entered into. Maybe you’ve got three months of exposure where you’ve agreed to a par- ticular rate. You can even drill down and see the P&L calculation: how much are we in or out of the money? That ability to roll it all up by strategy or line of business is a pretty powerful tool.”

THE ULTIMATE MISTAKE:

USING YESTERDAY’S TECH

TO TRADE FFAS TODAY

Listening to industry, Veson discov- ered that organizations were looking to move away from a defensive risk pos- ture and into a position of active control of their FFA portfolio. FFAs are one of the fastest growing areas within com- mercial shipping industry for many rea- son reasons. Spot traders, for example, often find themselves in need of liquid instruments offering protection against uncertainty and volatility. FFAs can also assist to mitigate counterparty risk exposure.

Absent a robust system to facilitate

FFA operations, however, many outfits still rely on spreadsheets that do not link to accounting or front-office func- tions. Still others spend inordinate amounts of time creating and manually updating standalone spreadsheets with market data. That’s a mistake, insists

Veson’s Efstathiou.

In fact, FFA operations as practiced today can be time consuming and inef- ficient. “People need to be able to quan- tify their exposure. Companies have risk in their commercial contracts, time and voyage charters. We often see com- panies managing these things in spread- sheets which are prone to manual error and not updated on a timely, automatic basis. So, if I’m in late tomorrow morn- ing because my daughter is sick, then the boss doesn’t have the latest Baltic data. What this creates is a lack of transparency around our exposure and access to real time information. The value of having data in real time is tremendous.”

MEASURABLE METRICS

The challenge of compiling a unified view of the company’s physical and paper freight positions cannot be under- estimated. Without this consolidated view, the company actually strips itself from most benefits that FFAs offer. Left with isolated islands of data, the end result is a failure to neither assess mar- gins on volatile freight rates nor utilize

SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS

TABLE A

Veson

Requirements

Checklist • Manage wet and dry FFAs as well as options • Automatically download market information from Baltic Exchange,

Imarex and other sources • Generate interactive exposure report of overall cargo, TC and Freight derivatives position • Consolidate long/short position with mark-to-market capabilities • Track credit levels and monitor exposure to Counterparties • Deliver batched positions: one unified view of P&L on several trades simultaneously • Automate the processing of invoices and integrate with corporate accounting • Security, audit and alert tools “People can tell you what their market view is. Very few of them can actually quantify that market view. With IMOS, you can do that.” +

Evangelos Efstathiou

Director, Trading & Risk Management

Maritime Logistics Professional

Maritime Logistics Professional magazine is published six times annually.