Best Effort Response To Cleaning Up Oil Spills
Marine Spill Response Corp. Projects 5-Year, $800 Million Program Two years ago, on a reef in Alaska's Prince William Sound, the oil tanker Exxon Valdez ran aground causing America's biggest oil spill.
While thousands worked to clean up the spill in Alaska, in Washington, a task force representing America's oil industry, set about studying the existing resources across the nation for responding to catastrophic oil spills.
As a result of task force recommendations, 20 oil companies began the process of creating the Petroleum Industry Response Organization (PIRO) to manage catastrophic spills. In August 1990, the oil companies created two new organizations: the Marine Spill Response Corporation (MSRC) and the Marine Preservation Association (MPA). MSRC, which has succeeded PIRO, is an independent oil spill response organization.
MSRC will operate from five Regional Response Centers, each supported by several strategically placed equipment sites along the coast, and will become the nation's largest spill response and cleanup organization. MPA, an organization comprised of oil companies and the shippers and receivers of oil, will fund MSRC but have no control over operations.
MSRC is headquartered in Washington, D.C., with our five regional response centers located along the coastal United States in the New York/New Jersey area, south Florida in Miami/Port Everglades area, the Lake Charles/Hackberry, Louisiana area in the Gulf, Port Hueneme, California in the Southwest, and the Seattle, Washington area in the Northwest.
Each region will have four to six prestaging areas (22 in all) where equipment, supplies and sometimes vessels and personnel will be located.
Each site has been selected to enable a quicker response to a large spill in areas of greater oil movements, and hence risk, along the coast.
MSRC, under the direction of the Coast Guard, will provide a "besteffort" response to cleaning up spills of persistent (crude) oils that are beyond the capacity of local response organizations. Each of five regional centers is designed to provide this "best effort" response to spills. MSRC's response capabilities are being designed based on a spill roughly the size of the Alaska spill.
Operationally, the nearest equipment/ resources will be brought to the scene. In the event of an even larger spill, some of the resources of two or more regions may be combined.
MSRC's five-year costs for operations, capital equipment, and research and development are estimated at more than $800 million.
These costs are funded through MPA members' annual dues, which will be based on the number of barrels of oil transported in the previous year. In the event an MPA member becomes a spiller, MSRC will be available to aid the spiller, consistent with its agreement with the spiller and the direction of the Coast Guard. The spiller—not MPA or MSRC—will pay for the actual cleanup.
Although MSRC is a private organization that will work closely under contract with a spiller, it will also work closely with government efforts. MSRC will be available to execute the appropriate portions of the spiller's response plan. Under the Oil Pollution Act, spillers must respond under the direction of the Coast Guard during major oil spills in coastal areas. The presence of the Coast Guard at a spill site does not relieve spillers of their responsibilities for funding the clean up. The Coast Guard must, however, provide clear direction and coordination of cleanup operations when spills or potential spills pose a substantial threat to the public health and safety.
MSRC is not intended to replace existing oil spill cooperatives and independent response contractors.
In fact, MSRC will use co-ops and independent responders as subcontractors for major spills and will train and drill with them. These existing entities have done a good job handling smaller spills. MSRC will only act when this infrastructure does not have sufficient resources for larger spills.
Under federal law, the responder to an oil spill has limited immunity.
He is not liable for removal costs or damages unless he acts with gross negligence or willful misconduct.
This limited immunity does not involve cases of personal injury or wrongful death. Under some state laws, however, the responder is not provided this limited immunity.
MSRC is seeking state liability standards that are the same as the federal standard. This standard is appropriate because an oil spill responder must act decisively in a dynamic environment. Moreover, responders frequently must act with less than perfect information.
Another unique aspect of MSRC will be administration of a research and development program to improve the technology and knowledge used to respond to and clean up spills. This program will complement others in government, academia, and industry. MSRC plans to study such subjects as prevention of oil loss from damaged ships, onwater oil recovery and treatment, prevention and mitigation of shoreline impacts, fate and effects of spilled oil and petroleum products, mitigation of adverse effects on wildlife, and health and safety.
MSRC will also aim to develop standards of oil spill response equipment, techniques and training.
MSRC plans to be fully operational by February 1993—the date when the Oil Pollution Act requires owners and operators of vessels, terminals, pipelines and offshore platforms to submit comprehensive spill response plans. Much must be done in the intervening two years.
A detailed implementation plan has been developed for MSRC, with most of the plan still in the process of being implemented. Equipment and vessels are being procured. Regional Response Centers must be surveyed and acquired. Land and buildings are being purchased or leased. Personnel—including hundreds of subcontractors—must be hired, trained and integrated into MSRC operations. Insurance must be arranged, and the research and readiness programs must be launched.
The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 requires that shippers and others responsible for oil transported on offshore and tidal waters show they can, to the maximum extent practicable, remove a "worst case" spill they might cause. This capability must reside in the private sector, and many companies may want to rely on MSRC to meet important federal response requirements, rather than obtain other response and cleanup capabilities.
Other stories from April 1991 issue
- Halter Marine Christens Second Of Two Navy Survey Ships page: 8
- Literature Available On COMSAT's SatCom Services page: 9
- New IMO Quabbin Package Improves Turbine Performance page: 9
- Balehi Marine Delivers Second Of Two GM-Powered Towboats For Conoco Oil Company page: 10
- Winninghoff Boats Introduces Versatile Workboat Design— Literature Available page: 11
- Wide Range Of Vessels Using Hamilton Water Jets Detailed In Free Literature page: 11
- Allied Shipbuilders Deliver New Caterpillar-Powered Z-Drive Ship-Assist Tug page: 12
- Saab Marine Reports Orders Received In Excess Of $35 Million page: 14
- World Bulk Fleet Expected To Increase Moderately For Next Few Years page: 16
- Lexair Introduces New Three-Way Poppet Type Control Valve page: 16
- Exxon Celebrates Grand Opening Of Port Allen Lubricants Plant page: 17
- Textron Marine Awarded $69.1 Million Navy LCAC Order Yard Completes SES Refurbishment page: 18
- Viking Introduces New 50-Man Reversible Buoyant Apparatus page: 19
- NEI Syncrolift Wins Over $3 Million In Orders For Shiplifts, Transfer Systems page: 20
- AT&T Awarded $157 Million Contract To Build Undersea Fiber-Optic Cable —Color Brochure Available page: 20
- OTC 91 page: 23
- Balancing The National Energy Strategy page: 30
- Gulf Craft Delivers 160-Foot Aluminum Crewboat For U.S. Gulf Operator page: 35
- Southwest Marine Reports Upturn In Ship Repair And Conversion Business page: 36
- American Ship Building Awarded Navy Contract For Up To Six Ocean Surveillance Ships page: 37
- Shipbuilding Surge Predicted For 90s page: 38
- Rail/Sea Link Crossing Soviet Union Opened By Sea-Land Service page: 39
- ASNE DAY 91 'Naval Engineering In The Changing Defense Structure' page: 42
- The Iowa Class Battleships page: 50
- PMSA Study Shows Impact Of Maritime Industry On 3 West Coast States page: 51
- General Dynamics Announces Two Key Appointments page: 51
- Inventory Locator Names Jim Bross Sales Director page: 52
- Hatch & Kirk Defco Division Opens In Houston, Texas page: 52
- Innovative Tug/Barge Training Begins At Maritrans GP page: 53
- War Showed Absolute Surge Requirement For More RO/ROs page: 54
- Sperry Marine Maintains Leading Position In Competitive Marine Electronics Market page: 55
- Archway Marine Lighting Introduces New Hi-Tech Searchlight Fixture Line page: 57
- Sound Ocean Systems, SUTEC Awarded NavSea MMUROV Contract page: 58
- Amprodux Introduces New Model Level Alarm/Control Unit page: 58
- Baldt Celebrates 90th Anniversary page: 59
- Krupp Atlas Introduces New Echosounders page: 60
- Astronomical Drilling Rig Prices Anticipated Because Of Worldwide Demand page: 60
- Murphy's All-New Gage And Control Catalog Pictures Over 80 Products page: 61
- Nordic Machine Expands Line Of Anchor Winches page: 62
- ZF Extends Range Of Marine Transmissions page: 62
- TWRA Members Adjust Rates Previously Set For U.S. Exports To Far East page: 63
- Sea Recovery Offers Compact, Commercial R.O. Desalinator page: 64
- Singapore Introduces Tax Plan To Lure Foreign Shipowners page: 65
- Louisiana Officials Create Oil Spill Cleanup Tax page: 65
- Kerr Becomes U.S. Agent For Brazil's Nacional Line page: 65
- McDermott Awarded Marathon Oil Contract page: 66
- DNV Grants Quality Certificate To Wartsila page: 66
- Jered Brown Bros. Expands Manufacturing Capability By Leasing Georgia Facility page: 66
- World's Largest Seiner Delivered By AESA page: 68
- MSE Offers 28-Page, Full-Color Brochure On Shipbuilding & Services page: 69
- 50,000-GRT 'Costa Classica' Launched At Fincantieri's Marghera Yard page: 70
- Thomas B. Crowley Jr. Appointed Manager, Red & White Fleet page: 71
- Shipowners In Hong Kong Welcome Canadian Moves To Offer Tax Incentives page: 71
- Tanker Owners Alter Practices To Cope With Risks Under Pollution Act page: 72
- Gladding-Hearn Building Detroit Diesel-Powered Catamaran For California Ferry Market page: 73
- SPD Technologies Names Colangelo Executive VP page: 74
- Stolt-Nielson Names White Managing Director, Tanker Trading-Europe page: 75
- Delaval Turbine Division Appoints Kramer, Morgan To Marketing Department page: 75
- Best Effort Response To Cleaning Up Oil Spills page: 76
- Severe Vessel Shortage, Advanced Age Of Fleet Threaten Some USSR Lines page: 76
- Schepen Appointed VP, Central America/Panama Service For Crowley page: 77
- Leslie Acquires Bailey Division, CMB Industries' Navy/Marine Product Lines page: 77
- Ingalls Christens USS Essex, Second Wasp Class Assault Ship page: 78
- Western Coal Shipments Through Great Lakes Ports Could Expand Dramatically page: 79
- Norwegian Navy To Build Nine MCMVs With Composite Hulls page: 80
- Tore Steen Appointed President And CEO, West State, Inc. page: 81
- PBM Designs Patented Flush Tank Valve— Literature Available page: 81
- New $40 Million NSF Research Ship Fitted With Thordon Bearings page: 84
- Leevac Shipyards Delivers First New Supply Vessel Built In U.S. Since 1986 page: 85
- McDermott Marine Readies Four-Pile Offshore Platform For Freeport-McMoRan page: 86
- Avondale To Use Japanese Method Of Building —Gets Trade Zone Status page: 86
- Trimble Navigation Introduces Integrated GPS Receiver And Antenna In One Unit page: 87
- Flexible Power Solutions* page: 88
- Marine Inland Fabricators Launches Tow Steering Unit page: 89
- Lykes Bros. Names Two New Officers page: 91
- Marine Liability Insurance Increases Up To Threefold For Tankers Trading To US page: 92