Innovation in the Engine Space
Turn of the century photographs of dirty, hot, cramped machine spaces filled with boilers, engines, gratings and bulkheads begin to tell the story of the state of steam power just after the birth of the propeller. Oil squirt cans, dancing connecting rods, and sweating coal passers and firemen characterized the engine rooms of the late 1800s when paddle wheels were gradually being replaced with the screw.
Pioneers of screw propulsion experimented with an assortment of propeller designs before commercial application of the concept began. The first screw-driven vessel in the U.S. Navy was the Princeton, built in 1843 by John Erickson. Even though the prop had many advantages over the paddle wheel, the fact that during the 1840s and 50s most ships were still made of wood posed significant challenges in terms of power, thrust, and managing the final drive to the propeller shaft.
In terms of engine design and construction, screw technology of the 1850s was much the same as paddle propulsion. Engineers tried a number of existing prime movers including beam, oscillating, and horizontal engines before finally deciding that the vertical direct-acting engine was the best solution.
One of the first installations of a beam engine turned sideways was by shipbuilder Todd & Mac- Gregor who laid down a 1,600-ton iron steamer in 1849. The ship's overhead beam engine had two 66 in. bore by 5 ft. stroke cylinders, each connected to its own beam by means of a connecting rod.
By 1862, the two-cylinder geared oscillating engine was adopted for the Cunard screw steamer China. The cylinders were 80 in. diameter and the stroke 5 ft. 6in. The gear wheels, more widely used than chain drives, contained four rows of wooden teeth, these being less noisy, easier to cut and less of a problem to lubricate than metal teeth.
Horizontal engines were the first truly successful plants for screw-driven vessels. Initially, readily available horizontal engines used for naval steamers were fitted into merchant ships. However the limited width of many merchant ships presented problems with fitting direct-drive horizontal engines.
The solution, according to many builders, was a vertical arrangement. By the mid-1800s, the vertical inverted direct-acting condensing engine became the main engine used on nearly all screwdriven vessels. Cylinders of an inverted engine were mounted on supports bolted to the bedplate, the piston rod of each cylinder passing through its lower cylinder cover and connecting with a crosshead running in guides attached to the cylinder supports. When owners realized that the inverted cylinder engine saved on engine-room floor space, allowing for more cargo, cabins or coal, inverted cylinders arranged vertically above the crankshaft became the norm for screw propul- Compound and Triple Expansion Engines Until this point all steam expansion took place in one cylinder. But with ongoing improvements in compound engines, the days of the simple expansion engine were numbered. By the 1870s compound engines were considered reliable, and the fuel saving advantages of compound expansion were clear. The first of these engines operated at about 60 psi while later compounds would use pressures of 80 to 100 psi. During the early years.
crankshaft strength limited engine power. Not until the introduction of higher quality steel were high output powers possible.
Use of the compound was followed by the triple expansion steam engine, considered reliable by the 1880s. In these engines, which needed a minimum of 120 psi to operate, the steam was exhausted from the high-pressure cylinder to the intermediate cylinder, then to a low-pressure cylinder. A triple expansion engine could operate at around 200 psi with a condenser vacuum of 26 inches of mercury.
The cranks were placed at 120° to give more uniform torque to the shaft. To operate with a higher pressure and offer smoother power, quadruple expansion engines were built as well. However, triple expansion technology dominated until the advent of the steam turbine.
Steam Turbine Invented in the 18th century, the rotary engine was not practical until 1884 when Sir Charles Parsons invented a turbine to operate an electrical generator.
The first turbine-powered vessel was the HMS Turbinia in 1897. This direct-drive engine operated at a relatively slow speed. The main problem with turbines was their high rotation speed — which required use of a reduction gear — and the fact that they were not reversible.
Yet, because of their favorable size-to-power ratio, steam turbines had been adopted for use in many large express passenger liners by the early 1900s. Canadian Pacific's 21,517-gross ton trans-Pacific liner Empress of Canada, which entered service in 1922, typified the period. Her propulsion plant consisted of two sets of Brown-Curtis turbines employing double reduction gearing, each set consisting of four separate turbines in series. During the war the turbine reigned supreme, driving First World War ships from large battleships to destroyers.
During the 1930s, manufacturers were preparing for war production. The main industrial wartime strategies were achieving standardization and developing increased manufacturing capacity and efficiency. Technology temporarily regressed in favor of producibility.
Because of an acute shortage of turbine, gear, and large diesel engine manufacturing capability, the approximately 3,000 ships built during WWII were powered with triple-expansion reciprocating steam engines. The 2,700 Liberty ships supplied by the Allies served the war effort in an exemplary fashion. Despite a significantly behind-the-times fuel rate of about 1.2 lb/ihp-hr, the ships' plants were capable of being operated by relatively inexperienced personnel.
To encourage o u r - ~ age exploitation of better fuel rates and alleviate the anticipated shortage of steam turbines and gears, a few experimental diesel installations took place just before and after the start of WWII. The direct-drive, British-patented, opposed-piston Doxford diesel engines were built in 3-, 4-, and 5-cylinder versions with 6,000 and 7,500 bhp continuous ratings.
These became the popular, American-made, large diesel engines, built by the Sun Shipbuilding and Drydock Company of Pennsylvania.
Postwar Progress After WWII, the unending quest for reduced weight and machinery space continued. By the late 1940s most steam merchant ships were turbine powered.
Striving for heat and space efficiency inevitably led to pressure-fired boilers, or supercharged steam generators.
In such boilers air from a turbine-driven compressor, powered by furnace exhaust gas was fed to the furnace at about 65 psi/490°F.
In the early 1960s U.S. operators of ocean-going vessels began to move toward increased speed and cargo system improvements. Grace lines' four Santa Magdalena- class (with a 20.5 knot speed) became the modern cargo carriers of the day. Both plants, which were of about 18,000 shp maximum, had two oil-fired Dtype water tube boilers supplying 600 lb steam to a single set of cross compound steam turbines driving double reduction gears and a single propeller. This design represented a conservative standard for U.S. power plants for the next decade.Relief from wartime restrictions led to more experimentation. More than 1,000 nearly new Liberty ships were targeted as working test beds and outfitted with a steam turbine, a free piston gas turbine, a regenerative gas turbine, or a diesel engine. The most notable of the Liberties was the John Sergeant converted in 1956 with a 6,000 shp opencycle regenerative gas turbine, double-reduction gears, and a controllable, reversible-pitch propeller.
Gas Turbine When the U.S. Navy made the transition to light dis- tillate fuel in the late 1960s and early 70s, the shift paved the way for a transition to more diesel- and gas turbine-powered combatants. By effectively equalizing the cost of the basic propulsion fuel, the cost advantage of the steam plant was lost and a logistical advantage for gas turbine power was born.
The gas turbine was touted as a compact, fuel-efficient plant that offered high power per unit weight.
While the concept predates the 20th century, it was not until after WWII that gas turbines began to find wide acceptance and application in power generation and propulsion. The first U.S. gas turbine-propelled merchant ship was the above-mentioned John Sergeant. Its low compression ratio, heavy-duty, industrial-type gas turbine's fuel consumption rate was a respectable 0.52 lb/shp-hr. By 1965 the Navy had installed many gas turbines for electric and auxiliary power, but only 78 for propulsion. One major step was the Navy's combined- diesel-or-gas propulsion plant for patrol motor gunboats, using diesel engines for cruising and a GE LM1500 gas turbine of 14,000 hp for high-speed operations.
Diesel Engine Drives Throughout the 1920s and 1930s the diesel engine found increasing favor with many ship owners because it was more economic to operate. Scandinavian ship owners turned almost exclusively to diesel. Only in terms of the large express liner could steam be classed as more economic than diesel in the late 1930s.
In the years preceding WWII, most diesels installed in the U.S. were direct drive reversing engines. Rapid expansion of demand for engines in the 50s and 60s led to a wide range of engines for propulsion varied from about 100 to about 5,000 bhp. Single reduction gear sets fitted with controllable reversing propellers or reversing reduction gears were available in a variety of sizes and the installation and capital costs of this arrangement were considerably lower than those of a steam plant.
Postwar diesel engine development proceeded in two almost diametrically opposed directions. For naval applications, engines were small, high-speed, and light-weight. Yet in merchant ships the trend was toward large, slow-speed engines of high power and high efficiency that burned costly fuels and maintained lower rpm to match lower propeller speeds. Diesel propulsion became more and more dominant in merchant ships even before the oil shortage in the 1970s overshadowed all other considerations in selecting machinery.
Marine Power Plants Today In the late 80s and early 90s engineers began to recognize the attributes of gas turbine power that would make it acceptable for commercial use. To preserve the maximum amount of ship space for generating revenue, owners sought compact and lightweight power solutions. The first main commercial use for gas turbines was in fast ferries. Today, space concerns and environmental interests have led some cruise lines to take another look at gas turbine technology.
Citing a goal to produce "the most environmentally sensitive cruise ships in the world," Demetrios Kaparis broke new ground in 2000 with his decision to implement gas turbine power — a technology he considers to be the "future of marine power plants" — on Celebrity's Millennium. While fuel cr ' are greater because of the use of distillates, some cruise lines have discovered an economic advantage to gas turbine-based plants, according to Dave Luck, manager of marine applications and ship integration at GE. "Having more cabins in the ship can more than offset the higher fuel cost." said Luck. In addition, pending environmental regulations and increased concern about exhaust emissions in some of the regions cruise ships serve have further influenced the decision to choose gas turbines.
Increasing environmental concern has also garnered new attention to earlier experiments with liquified natural gas (LNG) carriers. By next year, if all goes according to plan.
Statoil will become the first operator on the Norwegian continental shelf to feature LNG powered propulsion on its vessels.
While the construction cost of each vessel increased by $6 million, the company chose LNG technology because it would greatly reduce emissions.
Sources: Steam at Sea, by Dennis Griffiths, Conway Maritime Press, 1997.
Smoke Ash and Steam: Steam Engines on the West Coast of North America, by Robin E. Slieret. Western Isle & Cruise Drive Co. Ltd. 1997.
A Half Century of Maritime Technology 1943-1993, Ed.
by Harry Benford and William A. Fox: Powering Section written by David O'Neil, the Society of Naval Architects and Marine Engineers, 1993.
A freelance journalist for Newsweek, Rolling Stone, and Newsday, among other publications, Jessica DuLong is also assistant chief engineer on retired New York City fire - boat John J. Harvex.
Other stories from March 2002 issue
- Smit Develops High-Powered Wreck Removal Cutting System page: 4
- KMY To Consult on Icebreaker page: 8
- Bollinger To Build Three Boats for Chouest page: 9
- IFS And DNV Join Forces On IT Project page: 12
- Volvo Penta Signs $ 2 . 8M Tug Engine Contract page: 14
- Underwater Bonding Seals the Deal page: 17
- Grand Bahama Shipyard's Drydock Arrives page: 19
- One Cool Customer page: 21
- ReeferShip Ltd. Formed page: 23
- A.R. Larsen To Offer Turnkey Interior Services page: 23
- The Era of The Electronic Engine Is Here page: 24
- Rolls-Royce Package Approach Wins Order page: 25
- Innovation in the Engine Space page: 27
- Landmark LNG Carrier Launched by IZAR page: 28
- BY backs S&T Ecomax Tanker Design page: 31
- Maritrans Continues Double Hull Program page: 32
- French Snag LNG Order page: 32
- LR: Hearing is Believing page: 32
- Antifouling Paint Helps USCG Sink Maintenance Costs page: 36
- NSRP Projects Show Impressive Results page: 38
- Derecktor Wins AMHS Fast Ferry Deal page: 41
- Gas Turbines Continue Making Commercial Inroads page: 44
- Fleet F77 Extends Inmarsat's Offering s page: 46
- Spain: Finding Strength in Specialization page: 51